In January, Liquidity Services published the 2026 Automotive Manufacturing Surplus Asset Market Trends Report, which projected peak surplus asset volumes entering the market between Q2 and Q4 2026, as late-2025 restructuring decisions took full effect. Six months later, that window is open. Seller participation in Liquidity Services automotive auctions grew 42.5% year-over-year in Q2 fiscal 2026, even as bidding steadied. Supply is on schedule. Demand is more selective. And a war that no forecast included has redrawn the economics of moving manufacturing equipment across oceans.

The dual-source surplus wave is arriving on schedule

The restructuring of internal combustion and EV programs continues to push equipment into secondary channels. Automakers are now paying suppliers hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements for canceled EV programs (Irwin, 2026), and mid-market suppliers that retooled for EV powertrains now carry measurable stranded capital, especially in Europe (Beecham, 2026).

Circular channels keep absorbing parts-related surplus

The global recycled auto parts market remains on track to grow roughly 8% annually to nearly $30 billion by 2033, led by North America and APAC (Auto Recycling World, 2026).

What we got Right


Our January 2026 report made specific, verifiable predictions. Here is what we got right at the halfway mark of 2026.

Tariffs and supply chain pressure are driving regionalization

Cost pressure and supply chain risk remain top industry concerns for 2026, pushing OEMs and Tier suppliers to requalify production closer to end markets and rotate older assets into secondary channels (Baucus, 2026; Lehne, 2026).

The quality spread we described has hardened into a two-tier market

January described a surplus marketplace spanning proven legacy systems to near-new installations from cancelled projects, with automation displacing older, less flexible equipment. Six months on, that spread has hardened into distinct pricing tiers. High-specification, reconfigurable automation, including robot cells, modular lines, and EV-capable presses, holds firm pricing in North America and APAC, while softening is concentrated in inflexible, ICE-only, or poorly documented lines (Lehne, 2026). This is not a global fire sale. It is a widening quality spread.

What Changed?

A war redrew the cost map

The US-Iran conflict that began in late February closed the Strait of Hormuz, drove Brent crude to a peak of over $126 per barrel, and pushed war-risk insurance premiums to four or five times prior levels (Congressional Research Service, 2026; CNBC, 2026). No January forecast, ours included, priced this in.

The single-pathway assumption is gone

The electrification transition has not stopped, but the idea that one powertrain pathway would dominate everywhere equally is over. The surplus picture is more granular than a uniform global glut, and disposition strategy now depends heavily on what you own, where it sits, and how flexible it is.

The war Premium: Cost-Push, not Collapse

The Iran conflict has not forced a wholesale relocation of automotive parts capital expenditure. Its effect is subtler and, for surplus sellers, more interesting. Higher energy, freight, and insurance costs act as a cost-push factor that strengthens the economic case for buying regional surplus equipment rather than importing new gear from overseas.

War-risk insurance premiums for regional shipping have risen to four to five times prior levels, and carriers are rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid Red Sea exposure, adding weeks and costs to long-distance equipment moves (Congressional Research Service, 2026). For European parts makers, that math favors extending the useful life of existing gear and buying second-hand locally. For APAC buyers, it favors refurbished or regional surplus over imports. The net effect is firm regional pricing for high-specification, easily requalified equipment on both sides of the disruption.

Fuel costs reach the equipment market indirectly. Sustained high pump prices have weakened demand for ICE vehicles in Europe, where used ICE prices were already easing before the war began (AUTO1 Group, 2026). Softer ICE demand means more ICE production equipment heading to surplus, and steeper discounts when it gets there.

Regional Outlook

Technology

Reshoring and electrification continue to reshape capital expenditure. Rather than building greenfield plants, OEMs and Tier suppliers are retooling existing ICE facilities into mixed EV and ICE production, generating a steady flow of presses, machining centers, weld cells, and ICE-specific tooling into the secondary market (The Manufacturer, 2025; Reshoring Initiative, 2025). At the same time, extended lead times for new equipment are pushing buyers toward well-maintained used machinery, particularly reconfigurable and EV-compatible assets.

Reshoring activity is concentrated in manufacturing corridors across the Midwest and South-central regions, where automotive and battery investment keeps localized demand for industrial assets strong. Surplus pricing in these corridors remains relatively firm despite broader cyclicality in the industrial sector (Baker Institute, 2026).

One useful contrast: the semiconductor domain, where capital spending is concentrated in a handful of advanced-node fabs, produces a thin and highly specialized surplus market (Deloitte, 2026). Automotive restructuring produces the opposite, a broad, liquid secondary market with diverse buyers and faster price discovery. For automotive sellers, that liquidity is an advantage. Assets find buyers faster, and competitive bidding sets clearer prices.

Auto-Man-2

The European sector faces continued restructuring through 2026 and beyond, driven by slower-than-expected EV adoption, intensifying Chinese competition, high labor costs, and pressure to restore profitability (PwC, 2026; Reuters, 2026). OEMs are shifting away from large-scale expansion toward rationalizing footprints, consolidating operations, and converting legacy ICE facilities for mixed EV and hybrid production.

That conversion work will generate rising volumes of surplus across Europe: presses, machining centers, weld cells, paint systems, conveyors, and ICE-specific tooling entering auction channels. Facilities that cannot be economically converted face partial closure, downsizing, or divestment, particularly in high-cost Western Europe. Flexible, automation-ready equipment is the exception and should retain strong value as manufacturers prioritize mixed-platform plants (Financial Times, 2026). Investment continues to flow toward lower-cost corridors in Central and Eastern Europe, North Africa, and Turkey.

Auto-Man-1

Led by China and increasingly supported by Southeast Asia and India, APAC remains the global center of EV manufacturing growth (IEA, 2026). The same growth is producing significant overcapacity. Analysts expect consolidation among smaller Chinese EV makers and suppliers to escalate between 2026 and 2030, with plant closures, distressed asset sales, and rising volumes of surplus production equipment entering secondary channels (South China Morning Post, 2025). Beijing's decision to drop EVs from its priority list in the latest five-year plan underscores how the policy tailwind has shifted (Reuters, 2025).

Unlike Europe, where surplus stems from ICE phase-outs, APAC surplus will be driven by overcapacity and rapid technology cycles. Older-generation EV manufacturing equipment may depreciate quickly as Chinese makers keep investing in newer automation. Southeast Asia and India are positioned to absorb much of this equipment, making APAC one of the most active and price-competitive secondary markets in the world over the coming decade.

United States
EMEA
APAC

What our Marketplace Data Shows

Liquidity Services delivered a solid second quarter of fiscal 2026, with GMV up 6% to $389.9 million, revenue up 4% to $120.7 million, and adjusted EBITDA up 37%. Our number of registered buyers reached approximately 6.3 million, an 8% year-over-year increase (Liquidity Services, 2026). Within the Capital Assets Group, GMV grew 3%, with results tied to project cycles including plant closures, CapEx timing, and surplus disposition decisions.

The automotive numbers tell a sharper story. Bid volume more than doubled in the first and second quarters of fiscal 2025 versus the prior year. In fiscal 2026, bidding activity softened slightly in Q1 and more materially in Q2. Seller participation moved in the opposite direction, growing in every period and jumping 42.5% year over year in Q2 FY2026.

Read together: supply is building exactly as projected, while buyers are becoming more selective. This is the early stage of the saturation dynamic we flagged in January, and it is the single most important data point in this report for anyone holding idle equipment.

 

Q2 FY26 vs. Q2 FY25

42.5%

Increase in seller participation


6.3M registered buyers (+8% YoY)
2x+ bid volume during FY2025 peak
Q2 FY26 bidding activity began to soften

What This Means for Sellers

The disposition window we identified in January is open and narrowing. Three pressures compound from here.

Carrying Costs do not Pause

Idle manufacturing equipment typically loses 1 to 2% of its value every month, before accounting for floor space, insurance, maintenance, and property tax.

Seller Competition is Rising

Liquidity Services’ 42.5% jump in seller participation means there are more assets competing for the same buyer attention each quarter through year end.

Buyers are Concentrating Bids

In a selective market, flexible, well-documented assets attract competition. Poorly documented or single-purpose assets sit. Currently, complete documentation, maintenance records, and configuration detail directly affect recovery.

Two practical advantages matter more in this seller environment. First, selling assets in place eliminates relocation costs and logistics risk at exactly the moment freight and insurance costs have spiked. Second, compliance has gotten harder, not easier. Export controls and denied-party screening carry more weight in a wartime trade environment, and an audit-ready disposition process protects both recovery and reputation.

202d-Mid-Year-Automotive

CURRENT REPORT

2026 Mid-Year Update Automotive Manufacturing

Published Jul 27, 2026

PDF 680 KB

Download Report
Previous Reports
Automotive-H1
2026 Automotive Manufacturing

Published Feb 3, 2026

PDF 5.5 MB

2025-Mid-Year-Automotive
2025 Mid-Year Update Automotive Manufacturing

Published Aug 5, 2025

PDF 1.5 MB

2025-Automotive
2025 Automotive Manufacturing

Published Mar 3, 2025

PDF 4/1 MB

Looking Ahead

The second half of 2026 will be defined by:

  • Peak surplus supply through Q4 as late-2025 restructuring decisions fully land
  • Accelerating consolidation among Chinese EV makers, adding distressed assets to global channels
  • War-related cost-push will continue to favor regional secondary purchases, even if a ceasefire holds
  • A widening price gap between flexible, EV-capable assets and ICE-only equipment
  • Intensifying ESG and circular economy pressure on disposition strategy, particularly in Europe

The surplus opportunity we described in January has materialized. What changed is the urgency. Sellers who act in the next two quarters will face less competition and stronger regional demand than those who wait for the market to clear.

Resources and Research

Auto Recycling World. (2026). Recycled Auto Parts Market Forecast to Grow 8% a Year to 2033.
AUTO1 Group. (2026). AUTO1 Group Price Index, January 2026.
Baker Institute. (2026). Examining Supply Chains.
Baucus, L. (2026). 2026 Automotive Trends Report. Dykema.
Beecham, M. (2026). Automotive Market Trends 2026: Navigating Volatility, Innovation and Opportunity. S&P Global Mobility.
CNBC. (2026). Oil Drops 20% from 2026 Peak on Optimism over U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Talks.
Congressional Research Service. (2026). Iran Conflict and the Strait of Hormuz: Impacts on Oil, Gas, and Other Commodities.
Deloitte. (2026). Semiconductor Industry Outlook.
Financial Times. (2026). The European Cars Made in China.
IEA. (2026). Global EV Outlook 2026: Manufacturing and Trade.
Irwin, J. (2026). Why Automakers Are Paying Suppliers Hundreds of Millions of Dollars after Canceling EVs. Automotive News.
Lehne, H. (2026). Five Projections for the 2026 Automotive Industry Outlook. S&P Global Mobility.
Liquidity Services. (2026). Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Financial Results.
PwC. (2026). Global M&A Trends in Industrials and Services: 2026 Outlook.
Reshoring Initiative. (2025). 2025 Reshoring Survey Report.
Reuters. (2025). China Excludes EVs in Latest Five-Year Plan as Industry Grapples with Oversupply.
Reuters. (2026). Stellantis' New Era of Alliances.
South China Morning Post. (2025). Dozens of Chinese EV Makers Under Pressure to Fold or Trim Operations in 2026: Analysts.
The Manufacturer. (2025). Reshoring Boom Behind the Surge in Machine Tool Demand.

Turn your idle equipment into working capital